rickardnilsson.net is a weblog and the online home of web developer and father of three, Rickard Nilsson... More
Rickard blogs about creating software solutions using ASP.NET and agile practices.
In my current project we have adopted the Continuous Integration process and its key practices, some of which we’ve used in previous projects, but not all at once.
The project technology stack looks like this:
We have been using Team Foundation Server since version 2005 and all new and ongoing projects use it, however, Continuous Integration takes source control to another level and require us to put more stuff in there than we are use to. For example, all versions of web.config is stored and version controlled through the Web.config Transformations in ASP.NET 4. This gives us easy access and great control over the different configuration setups we use in all our environments.
Compiling, building and running unit tests is something we’ve been doing for years in Visual Studio, but when we had to do the same in an automated Continuous Integration process we could not rely on the build scripts generated by Visual Studio (e.g. all .csproj-files) alone but had to learn MSBuild our selves. It turned out to be a very good thing. Build scripting languages like MSBuild give you the power to do pretty much anything you need to build your software in an automated fashion, and it is the core building block for Continuous Integration and development automation in general.
We have for instance used MSBuild scripts to automate deployment to multiple sites and to generate code coverage reports publishable in Team City.
In my opinion, to be able to automatically verify that features we implemented earlier continue to work throughout the project and beyond, is the single most valuable practice in our profession. Think of how many hours you spend testing the same thing over and over, if you don’t have tests. Start automating testing today, and you do not want to go back.
The automated testing part of Continuous Integration is what really makes it all worth it. Plus, the rapid integration feedback act as a motivator for keeping the test coverage high and not falling for the temptation to get lazy and skip tests. If the coverage drops you can not be as confident that the code is healthy even though the build passed.
My highest priority is unit tests, followed by integration tests. I’ve started to look at acceptance testing and I plan to integrate that in our CI process later.
A short check in-cycle is key to getting value from Continuous Integration. In practice this means that I try to check in as soon as I can describe the change as a check in comment. If I have a hard time describing the change, it’s probably a sign I have done too much, and should have checked in earlier.
We chose to use Team City on our build servers because it was so easy to get started. In my first attempt I installed Team City on my dev machine, created a new project in the web user interface, connected the project to TFS, and hooked it up to build using the Visual Studio .sln-file. It took less than 20 min to get a full Continuous Integration build running on every check in. But it doesn’t stop there, Team City supports every imaginable tool for build automation and is fully extensible.
In previous projects I’ve always felt impeded by a slow and error prone deployment process. A consequence is often that deployment can only be performed by one individual from his or her machine. In my current project I focused hard on getting it automated from the beginning. We have multiple sites that all need to get deployed at once so we’ve set up a build configuration in Team City where anyone on the project at any time can at the click of a button, get the latest from source control, run the check in-tests, and deploy to all servers. Usually this takes no more than a minute.
The secret behind this is the new IIS Web Deployment Tool from Microsoft (also known as MS Deploy). It enables a user without administrator privileges to synchronize the content of a site in IIS. Synchronization is key to making the deployment go super fast since we never need to do a full transfer, only the changes are pushed.
In the following example I will show how easy it is to isolate your client code from ASP.NET code, using the Moles Isolation Framework, in order to test that your code performs as intended.
The example should not be seen as an encouragement to use bad design. On the contrary, I urge you to use Moles to get that ugly, old legacy code you’ve got, and put it under test such that you will have the freedom to rip it apart and improve it.
Now Moles will generate an assembly with mocks and stubs of the target assembly (System.Web) and add it to the test project. Your references should look like this:
Now you are ready to start writing tests. First we take a look at our sample application. It is a simple ASPX-page which calls Server.MapPath() in the Page_Load method:
public partial class ServerUsageExamplePage : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { //... Server.MapPath("...");
//... } }
In our unit test we want to be able to replace the call to Server.MapPath() such that
The following test method will fake the call to Server.MapPath() and assert that it was actually called by the method under test:
[TestMethod] [HostType("Moles")] public void MapPath_WhenCalledWithProperContext_ShouldInvokeServerMethod() { // Arrange var mapPathWasCalled = false; MHttpContext.CurrentGet = () => new MHttpContext { ServerGet = () => new MHttpServerUtility { MapPathString = path => { mapPathWasCalled = true; return string.Empty; } } };
// Act var page= new ServerUsageExamplePage(); page.Page_Load(this, EventArgs.Empty);
// Assert Assert.IsTrue(mapPathWasCalled); }
To accomplish this we need to understand what is going on. “Server” is an instance property on the System.Web.UI.Page class which eventually will invoke the HttpContext.Current.Server property. Thus, to fake the method call we need to fake several things:
Finally, to be able to execute the method under test (Page_Load), we need to change its accessibility from protected to public.
I've shown how easy it is to get started covering your ASP.NET codebehinds with unit tests utilizing Moles Isolation Framework. Please leave feedback and any questions you might have. Good luck testing!
Moles is a new framework from Microsoft Research for isolating objects in unit tests. With the framework you create test stubs by using delegates and you can route any .NET method you want, including non-virtual and static methods in sealed classes. In addition, the framework is free, making it a major competitor to TypeMock Isolator that has been alone on this functionality for a long time.
Moles automatically generates stubs for all classes in one assembly. Here is an example of how easy it is to change the behavior of the static DateTime.Now property:
// change the value of DateTime.Now MDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2000,1,1); if (DateTime.Now == new DateTime(2000,1,1)) throw new Y2KBugException();
Mole’s strength to fake and reroute static methods and the like makes it a very powerful tool for isolating and unit testing code developed for SharePoint. Microsoft Research has a whitepaper that describes how to get started:
Unit Testing SharePoint with Microsoft Foundation Pex and Moles
Here is a video that introduces Moles: